|
|
Post by Humming is good for you.... on Apr 22, 2007 12:52:59 GMT -5
no
|
|
|
|
Post by The Shadow on Apr 22, 2007 18:39:00 GMT -5
yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Humming is good for you.... on Apr 22, 2007 22:32:18 GMT -5
no
|
|
|
|
Post by The Shadow on Apr 24, 2007 16:09:07 GMT -5
yes
|
|
|
|
Post by lawnmower on Apr 25, 2007 9:45:49 GMT -5
maybe?  |
|
|
|
Post by The Shadow on Apr 25, 2007 14:35:44 GMT -5
prehaps?
|
|
|
|
Post by Humming is good for you.... on Apr 25, 2007 20:04:47 GMT -5
absolutely not
|
|
|
|
Post by The Shadow on Apr 26, 2007 14:24:02 GMT -5
positively so
|
|
|
|
Post by Humming is good for you.... on Apr 26, 2007 19:19:37 GMT -5
...negatively ..not...?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Shadow on May 6, 2007 0:20:00 GMT -5
That's a double negative, which means yes, so I win. Algebra skills for the win!
|
|
|
|
Post by Humming is good for you.... on May 6, 2007 13:24:15 GMT -5
no!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Shadow on May 9, 2007 0:50:22 GMT -5
yes!
I just got home from watching Hot Fuzz, which I've been waiting for for a LOOONG time...ZOMG FUNNY. Everyone has to go watch it RIGHT NOW.
Simon Pegg: "...just wanted to be like my Uncle Derek."
Nick Frost: "Sounds like a cool bloke."
Simon Pegg: "Actually, he got arrested for selling drugs to school kids."
Nick Frost: "What a ****."
Timothy Dalton: "SWAN!!![/i]"
|
|
grimmacemain
Page of the Inner Temple of Postville
Posts: 20
|
Post by grimmacemain on May 27, 2007 7:59:58 GMT -5
how about shrek 3? i'm going to see that tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Humming is good for you.... on May 31, 2007 22:41:38 GMT -5
no!
and shrek 3 was pretty good but it doesn't live up to how good the first one was
|
|
grimmacemain
Page of the Inner Temple of Postville
Posts: 20
|
Post by grimmacemain on Jun 1, 2007 14:59:57 GMT -5
yeah, but it was still pretty funny. especially him talking about pooping and crying babies.
|
|
